Blenderized tube feedings: Practice recommendations from the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.

Prior to the 1970s, blending food and liquids and putting them through an enteral access device (EAD) was the most common form of enteral nutrition (EN). However, in the 1970s, blenderized tube feedings (BTFs) became less popular due to the emergence of modern commercial enteral formulas (CEFs). Recently, a cultural shift toward consuming a natural diet, consisting of whole foods, has led to a resurgence in the use of BTF. The increasing use of BTF in a variety of patient care settings identifies a need for practice recommendations that provide guidance for nutrition professionals and patients. Members of the American Society for Parental and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) Enteral Nutrition Committee identified salient clinical questions concerning BTF, conducted a comprehensive literature search, and subsequently developed practice recommendations pertaining to the use of BTF. This paper was approved by the ASPEN 2022-2023 Board of Directors.

Medical line entanglement: The unspoken patient safety hazard of medical devices.

BACKGROUND: In February 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration published a safety communication regarding the risk of strangulation from enteral feeding delivery sets. When it comes to the causes of accidental strangulation or asphyxiation, it is common knowledge that household items, such as window blind cords, are potential hazards. However, many people may not expect that medical devices may pose similar risks because of medical line entanglement (MLE). METHODS: A survey of clinicians from pediatric acute care and outpatient facilities and caregivers of patients with medical lines was conducted with a goal to understand if clinicians and caregivers are aware of MLE, if healthcare facilities have policies and procedures related to the prevention of MLE, and if education about the risks of MLE is provided to caregivers when they first receive a medical device. RESULTS: The survey was shared through clinician organizations and patient advocacy groups. Responses were received from 191 clinicians and 117 caregivers. A majority of clinicians reported awareness of the risk of entanglement; however, few received direction from their employer on managing these risks. Caregivers (N = 106) reported that their child had experienced MLE, however only 9% of those caregivers recalled receiving any education on MLE from their healthcare providers. CONCLUSION: This survey demonstrates the need for healthcare facilities to develop programs for managing risks of MLE and for healthcare teams and caregivers to discuss prevention methods whenever an at-risk patient is sent home with a medical device that poses a risk for entanglement.

Choosing wisely: Enteral feeding tube selection, placement, and considerations before and beyond the procedure room.

When an enteral feeding tube (EFT) is placed, it is not always known how long this nutrition support intervention will be needed. As a result, the type of device the patient originally has placed may not match the function it is required to serve or the lifestyle needs of the patient throughout their enteral nutrition journey. Medicare considers an EFT a prosthetic device, as it is replacing a permanently inoperable or nonfunctioning organ. If we think about an EFT the same way we think about a prosthetic limb, one that needs to be customized to meet all of the patient's functional and lifestyle needs, we can also begin to think beyond the procedure room and carefully consider a variety of factors that impact the patient at home receiving enteral nutrition. Proper fit, function, and style is essential in order for the patient to have a positive relationship with their EFT, contributing to their successful home enteral nutrition experience. Clinicians who care for these patients in any setting and in any capacity would benefit from enhancing their understanding of available EFT options, their design components, and available methods of placement. Many home care and outpatient clinicians adopt the role of patient advocate as it relates to a patient's enteral nutrition journey, and this expanded knowledge could be used to benefit the patient by improving their overall enteral nutrition experience and ultimately their relationship with their "prosthetic."

Dispelling Myths and Unfounded Practices About Enteral Nutrition.

Many protocols and steps in the process of enteral nutrition (EN) use are not overly supported with strong research and have been done the same way over many years without questioning the use of best-practices evidence. This article reports many of the myths and unfounded practices surrounding EN and attempts to refute those myths with current evidence. These practices include those about enteral access devices, formulas, enteral administration, and complications.